Sign Up!


Updated 1/10/2013
2011 Form 990

Updated 6/22/2011
3ABN sued
over Tommy!

Added 3/14/2010
Can 3ABN Survive?

Added 11/16/2010
Judge Rejects
Plea Deal

Updated 4/2/2010
Tommy Shelton

Must Read:
Mom in Pain #1

Mene, Mene,
Tekel, Parsin

The Actual Lawsuit
IRS Criminal Investigation

Round Two: Gailon Joy

< Prev.Next >

Due to the abrogation of the confidentiality agreement by Harold Lance, the following communication is provided for your perusal.

Gailon seeks confirmation that ASI and 3ABN are refusing to look at the other allegations that were supposed to have been part of the investigation. And if the only issue is going to be the divorce and remarriage, how can that be looked into when there is still a civil case pending?

-------- Original Message --------
From:  G. Arthur Joy
To:  Harold Lance,
Gregory Matthews, Bob Pickle, Linda Shelton,
Deb Young, Ron Christman,
Walt Thompson, Danny Shelton
Subject:  Re: Comments re the process
Date:  Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:06:21 +0000

Do we understand that the 3ABN Board only wants to address the issues related to the allegations by Danny Shelton, from the period of approximately Feb 2004 to the present, to various persons and entities that lead to accusations of adultery, and claimed to have had evidence thereto, and resulted in a divorce, Linda's response, the responses of various parties and entities, including, but not limited to, Johann Thorvaldson, Dr. Arild Abrahamsen, 3ABN employees, purported counselors, the 3ABN Chairman, the 3ABN investigative committee, the 3ABN Board of Directors, 3ABN statements to it's world viewing audience, 3ABN statements in various publications or letters, 3ABN statements on various web-sites and blogs, The West Frankfort / Thompsonville SDA church and leadership, the Springfield SDA church and leadership, The Illinois Conference- leadership- executive committee, Linda's communications with various parties and entities, Linda's website and such other infor mation as may be pertainent to motive, purpose and results of the actions of each party? That such consideration is to be based upon the biblical standard?

Is it clear that this is the only issue that the panel is being asked to address and is solely based upon the 3ABN board request?

And just what is the scope of the possible recommendations allowed by the panel pursuant to this clearly delimited process?

And what assurance does the church laiety have that the ASI panel recommendations would be implemented by the 3ABN board?

And what is everyones' view of the appropriateness to empanel a panel to review this issue while the civil case involving distribution of marital assets is still pending?

That ASI does not intend, in fact, refuses, to address any other issue?

And what would be the proposed timeline for such a limited panel?

Gailon Arthur Joy

< Prev.Next >
Not © 2008